Test result preview
The activated charcoal filter from Pillis has proven to be a useful filter insert in an extractor bonnet with a good price-performance ratio. The workmanship is very detailed, so that all grooves and edges appear to be of high quality, without fibre residues or processing errors. With the very detailed installation instructions supplied and a pair of disposable gloves for removing the filter, the product is designed to last, making filter changes as convenient as possible even after use as a dirty product. On the negative side, there was no website available at the time of the product test, which meant that only limited information on the product could be obtained.
Advantages
- Very detailed finish
- Structured surface
- Long-term packaging contents
Disadvantages
- No product website available
The first impression
Packaging and contents
Here we take a closer look at packaging. Sustainability is becoming an increasingly important factor. In addition, adequate protection of the product must of course also be guaranteed. Are the contents of the packaging complete and does the manufacturer make it as easy as possible for me to use the product straight away?
Criterion
Remark
Score achieved*
Product protection
Carton is sturdy, product sufficiently protected
Points
Sustainability Packaging
Unnecessary packaging waste has been avoided and the necessary plastic film protects the product components
Points
Package contents & scope
Complete
Points
Instructions for use
Very detailed instructions for use with notes
Points
TOTAL
98
Points
Weighting: 20%
*Themaximum score is 100 points
The activated charcoal filter is supplied in a sturdy and thickly packed cardboard box. A multilingual operating manual with illustrated installation instructions is included. A pair of disposable gloves is also supplied for removing the used filter at a later date. The activated charcoal filter is supplied wrapped in a thin plastic film to protect it from moisture and other influences during transport.
The first time in your hand
Product processing and appearance
Before we start the practical test, we take a close look at the workmanship of the products. How high quality are the materials used? Are the look and feel satisfactory?
Criterion
Remark
Points achieved*
Visual appearance
Attractive design
Points
Processing
Very good workmanship
Points
Stability
Very stable
Points
Sustainability of the product
No specifications, but use of high-quality materials and only necessary plastic film
Points
TOTAL
95
Points
Weighting: 20%
*Themaximum score is 100 points
The product design is classically based on an activated carbon filter. The processing of the felt edges is clean, virtually fibre-free and without production residues. All grooves and the mouths are very well finished and have no open-pored processing defects. Despite the necessary flexibility, the product is very stable and can be easily handled and processed by hand during installation. No information has been provided on the durability of the product, but long-term use can be assumed due to the high-quality workmanship.
This is what our practical test showed
Does the manufacturer keep its advertising promises?
Our practical test has the highest relevance and therefore weighting. Here, the product has to undergo a wide range of criteria and tests. We check the functions and product promises of the test article.
Criterion
Remark
Score achieved*
Noise level measurement
No increased volume detectable
Points
Cleaning and maintenance
Minimal, inconspicuous residue without functional impairment
Points
Comparison with and without filter
Minimal, non-disturbing difference in odour
Points
Filter surface sighting
Intact, clean surface
Points
Influence on room quality
Noticeably better air quality in the kitchen
Points
TOTAL
94
Points
Weighting: 45%
*Themaximum score is 100 points
In the practical test, the activated charcoal filter was tested in a similar cooker bonnet due to its fit. On a positive note, the volume of the cooker bonnet did not increase when using the filter, so that no difference could be perceived. Minimal, inconspicuous residues were found when cleaning the filter, but these did not impair its function in any way. The minimal difference in odour was not perceived as disturbing and is barely perceptible during normal use. The filter surfaces were always clean and intact. On a positive note, there was a noticeable and measurable difference in the air quality.
Test plan of the Prüfengel Institute
You can find a detailed insight into the evaluation criteria of the practical part of the test and the distribution of points here. If you are also interested in the evaluation of our other test criteria, please read our document on the evaluation process.
Price/performance ratio
and ratings from consumers
Finally, we analyse how the product compares to the competition. Can it keep up with the competition in terms of price and quality? Would we generally recommend buying it? We also look at the consumer reviews and check whether the critical and positive reviews are actually justified.
Criterion
Remark
Score achieved*
Price / performance ratio
Very good performance in the lower price segment
Points
TOTAL
90
Points
Weighting: 15%
*Themaximum score is 100 points
At the time of testing, the product had not been listed on Amazon for long enough. Therefore, the existing reviews do not sufficiently reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the product, so this point is neglected in the evaluation.
Prices of up to €99.97 are charged on the Internet for equivalent products. Very affordable products are available from as little as €24.97 . The activated charcoal filter from Pillis® is therefore currently in the lower price segment with a price of €29.99. For the quality and performance received, the price-performance ratio is very good.
Overall result
Weighting
Score achieved*
1. packaging & contents
20%
Points
2. product processing & appearance
20%
Points
3. in the practical test
45%
Points
4. price/performance & consumer reviews
15%
Points
TOTAL
Points
*Themaximum score is 100 points
