The garment bag from Bruce. made a very good impression in our test. In addition to the high-quality workmanship, the product impresses with its elegant yet simple design. Only the viewing window could not match the otherwise flawless quality. The product protects clothing from dirt, moisture and vermin, while the material remains breathable . Although the zipper cannot be opened across the entire front, it still offers enough space to place items of clothing. Transport is effortless thanks to the metal eyelets, carrying handle and press studs in the form of a handy bag. If the customer is not satisfied with the product, they can cancel their purchase within 30 days.
Advantages
✅ High-quality workmanship
✅ easy to transport
✅ suitable for the washing machine
✅ Excellent protection
✅ Money-back guarantee
Disadvantages
❌ Quality of the viewing window
❌ Zipper could be longer
The first impression
Packaging and labeling
ℹ️ Here we take a closer look at packaging. Sustainability is becoming an increasingly important factor. In addition, adequate protection of the product must of course also be ensured.
Criterion | Remark | Score achieved* |
---|---|---|
Product protection | Carton is sturdy, product sufficiently protected | 95 points |
Sustainability Packaging | No unnecessary packaging waste, polybag to protect the product | 80 points |
Product labeling | Labeling on the plastic film | 100 points |
Total | 92 points |
*The maximum score is 100 points
The garment bag from Bruce. arrived for our test in the typical shipping box. It was undamaged and easy to open by removing the adhesive strip. Inside the box, the product was packed in a polybag. This packaging method ensures that the product is optimally protected from external influences and shipped hygienically . It is also not necessary to remove any labels. Product protection was therefore fully guaranteed and the garment bag was delivered in perfect condition .
The packaging is partially recyclable. However, the plastic film cannot be recycled. Notwithstanding this, the presentation of the product makes a very good impression.
After unpacking
Package contents and instructions
ℹ️ Most people’s first impression after unpacking is immediately memorable. Are the contents of the package complete and does the manufacturer make it as easy as possible for me to use the product straight away?
Criterion | Remark | Score achieved* |
---|---|---|
Package contents & scope | Garment bag in the size 100×60 cm | 90 points |
Contact information | Can be found on the polybag | 100 points |
Total | 93 points |
*The maximum score is 100 points
The garment bag was loose in the shipping box without any label, so no utensils were needed to remove the packaging. On a positive note, the product arrived with a neutral odor. Instructions for use were not included, but are not necessary for the product.
All contact information can be found on the polybag, including a telephone number and email address. Overall, this is a very good way to send a product.
The first time in your hand
Product processing and appearance
ℹ️ Before we start the practical test, we take a close look at the product processing. How high quality are the materials used? Is the look and feel satisfactory?
Criterion | Remark | Score achieved* |
---|---|---|
Visual appearance | Very good visual appearance | 100 points |
Processing | Very good workmanship | 90 points |
Stability | Very stable | 100 points |
Sustainability of the product | No information on sustainability, but high quality, machine washable | 80 points |
Total | 93 points |
*The maximum score is 100 points
First of all, it should be mentioned that the garment bag makes a very good visual impression. We didn’t notice any manufacturing defects , the material is robust and flexible, but still retains its shape. The product also impresses with its elegant yet simple design. Only the material of the viewing window appears less high-quality, somewhat stiff and has unsightly scratches after the first crease.
Bruce. has thought about sustainability, as the garment bag can be washed and thus reused even after soiling. However, the materials used appear to be of very high quality, which is why we assume a long service life . If the customer is not satisfied with the product, they will also receive their money back within 30 days if they return it.
This is what our practical test showed
Does the manufacturer keep its advertising promises?
ℹ️ Our practical test is the most relevant and therefore the most important. Here, the product has to undergo a wide range of criteria and tests. We check the functions and product promises of the test article.
Criterion | Remark | Score achieved* |
---|---|---|
Handling | Zipper could be longer | 80 points |
Protection | Water, dirt and vermin repellent | 100 points |
Transportation | Easy transportation thanks to metal eyelets, handles and press studs | 100 points |
Size | Suitable for suits, jackets, jackets, shirts; rather not for dresses | 90 points |
Variants | 100×60 cm or 120×60 cm, various sets available | 90 points |
Total | 92 points |
*The maximum score is 100 points
The garment bag has provided optimum protection for our garments against dirt, moisture and vermin. Water that we splashed over the material beaded off instead of penetrating the inside. The material is still breathable.
In our practical test, we stowed various items of clothing in the garment bag. We noticed that the zipper was not pulled over the entire front, which requires extra care to ensure that any items of clothing are placed without creasing. We recommend the longer model for dresses (from knee length). Transportation using the garment bag is effortless. Thanks to the attached metal eyelets at the bottom, the carrying handle and the press studs , the product can be folded into a handy bag that can be easily attached to the suitcase or carried in the hand.
The tested model in the 100×60 cm size is also available in 120×60 cm and various sets (3 garment bags and 1 shoe bag or set of 5).
Price/performance ratio
and ratings from consumers
ℹ️ Finally, we look at how the product compares to the competition. Can it keep up with the competition in terms of price and quality? Would we generally recommend buying it? We also examine consumer ratings and check whether the critical and positive reviews are actually justified.
Criterion | Remark | Score achieved* |
---|---|---|
Price / performance ratio | Good | 85 points |
Rating cut | 4.4 out of 5.0 on Amazon | 70 points |
Total | 78 points |
*The maximum score is 100 points
On the Amazon platform, consumers have given the product an average rating of 4.4 stars. Some complain that the size is too small and that the product smells chemical . On the other hand, other reviewers find the fit ideal, did not notice any unpleasant odor and recommend the product. The quality and robustness are also praised. In our practical test, we were able to confirm that the size fits perfectly for a suit, but that the larger model should be chosen for dresses. We were unable to detect any chemical odor. Overall, we are also impressed by the quality of the product.
Prices of up to €27 are charged on the Internet for equivalent products. Very inexpensive products, on the other hand, are available for as little as €3. With a current price of €12.99, the garment bag from Bruce. is therefore in the middle price segment. Consequently, the price ratio is good for the quality and scope of services you get.
Overall result
Weighting | Score achieved* | |
---|---|---|
1. packaging & labeling | 10% | 92 points |
2. package contents & instructions | 10% | 93 points |
3. product processing & appearance | 20% | 93 points |
4. in the practical test | 40% | 92 points |
5. price/performance & consumer ratings | 20% | 78 points |
Total | 90 points |